1952 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 777 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volkswagen Caddy. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2012 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volkswagen |
Model | Tickford | Caddy |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2307 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2690 mm |