1952 Austin Princess vs. 1973 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 289 kg more than 1952 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin Princess | 1973 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | Calais |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 2245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3310 mm |
