1952 Austin Princess vs. 1973 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1973 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 55 kg more than 1952 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin Princess | 1973 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | DeVille |
Year Released | 1952 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3310 mm |