1952 Austin Princess vs. 1979 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 1979 Lincoln Continental is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 325 kg more than 1979 Lincoln Continental.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1979 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin Princess 1979 Lincoln Continental
Make Austin Lincoln
Model Princess Continental
Year Released 1952 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 6554 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 313 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1855 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 5570 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2990 mm