1952 Austin Princess vs. 1991 Cadillac Allante

To start off, 1991 Cadillac Allante is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,087 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Cadillac Allante (168 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 590 kg more than 1991 Cadillac Allante.

Because 1952 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Cadillac Allante, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1991 Cadillac Allante has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1952 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Cadillac Allante will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: