1952 Austin Princess vs. 1997 Maserati Shamal

To start off, 1997 Maserati Shamal is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Maserati Shamal (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 860 kg more than 1997 Maserati Shamal.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Maserati Shamal (444 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1997 Maserati Shamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin Princess 1997 Maserati Shamal
Make Austin Maserati
Model Princess Shamal
Year Released 1952 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 3217 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 321 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 444 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4110 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2520 mm