1952 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 790 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin Princess 2000 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model Princess Mustang
Year Released 1952 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 118 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 298 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2750 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2580 mm