1952 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin Princess (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 44 kg more than 1952 Austin Princess.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin Princess | 2000 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | Princess | Armada |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4310 mm |