1952 Austin Princess vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac

To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Hac is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 849 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.

Because 1952 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess. 2000 Volkswagen Hac has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1952 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Volkswagen Hac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: