1952 Austin Princess vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin Princess | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Princess | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 301 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2380 mm |