1952 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 381 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1952 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin Princess (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1952 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. 2004 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1952 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1952 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin Princess | 2004 Chrysler Concorde | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | Princess | Concorde |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4850 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 68 L |
