1952 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 171 kg more than 1952 Austin Princess. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (287 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin Princess | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Princess | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 132 L |
