1952 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess.
Because 2004 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 1952 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin Princess | 2004 Land Rover Freelander | |
| Make | Austin | Land Rover |
| Model | Princess | Freelander |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 174 HP |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2570 mm |
