1952 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 671 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin Princess (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin Princess | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Princess | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |
