1952 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 793 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (335 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin Princess 2005 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model Princess Mustang
Year Released 1952 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 4009 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 335 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1387 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2720 mm