1952 Austin Princess vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin Princess | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Princess | Commodore |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |