1952 Bentley Mark VI vs. 1986 Porsche 928

To start off, 1986 Porsche 928 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley Mark VI would be higher. At 4,957 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Porsche 928 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bentley Mark VI weights approximately 304 kg more than 1986 Porsche 928.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Bentley Mark VI 1986 Porsche 928
Make Bentley Porsche
Model Mark VI 928
Year Released 1952 1986
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4256 cc 4957 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 321 HP
Top Speed 161 km/hour 274 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1854 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2510 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]