1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 519 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Because 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Bentley | Matra-Simca |
Model | R Type Continental | Rancho |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |