1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 1998 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 461 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 1998 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Bentley | Fiat |
Model | R Type Continental | Bravo |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 213 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 60 L |