1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 159 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bentley | Ford |
| Model | R Type Continental | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4566 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 1492 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 68 L |
