1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 293 kg more than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental.
Because 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
| Model | R Type Continental | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4566 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2173 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5207 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 83 L |
