1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 908 kg more than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
| Model | R Type Continental | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4566 cc | 5328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 2559 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 5621 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1946 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 119 L |
