1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 183 kg more than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental.
Because 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Bentley | Ford |
Model | R Type Continental | Taurus |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 1834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2177 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 75 L |