1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Bentley | Smart |
| Model | R Type Continental | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 1867 mm |
