1952 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 267 kg more than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Bentley R Type Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bentley R Type Continental | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Bentley | Volvo |
| Model | R Type Continental | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4566 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1651 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2774 mm |
