1952 BMW 340 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 349 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | BMW | Hudson |
| Model | 340 | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3030 mm |
