1952 BMW 340 vs. 1960 Humber Hawk
To start off, 1960 Humber Hawk is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Humber Hawk (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Humber Hawk should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Hawk weights approximately 150 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 1960 Humber Hawk | |
| Make | BMW | Humber |
| Model | 340 | Hawk |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2266 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2800 mm |
