1952 BMW 340 vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1963 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 218 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 340 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2060 mm |