1952 BMW 340 vs. 1978 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 1978 Cadillac Seville is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Cadillac Seville (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 640 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1978 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 340 | Seville |
Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2910 mm |