1952 BMW 340 vs. 1978 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro (165 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 335 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1978 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |