1952 BMW 340 vs. 1978 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1978 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Fiat Ritmo (73 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1978 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1978 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 340 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2430 mm |