1952 BMW 340 vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 340 | 265 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |