1952 BMW 340 vs. 1983 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Seville is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Seville (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 420 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1983 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 340 | Seville |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4080 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2900 mm |