1952 BMW 340 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 BMW 340 (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 BMW 340 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 340 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |