1952 BMW 340 vs. 1993 Toyota Aristo
To start off, 1993 Toyota Aristo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Toyota Aristo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Toyota Aristo (220 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Toyota Aristo should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Toyota Aristo weights approximately 476 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 1993 Toyota Aristo | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | 340 | Aristo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1726 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2790 mm |
