1952 BMW 340 vs. 1997 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1997 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 370 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1997 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |