1952 BMW 340 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Metro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Metro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Metro.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1998 Chevrolet Metro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | Metro |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2370 mm |