1952 BMW 340 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 63 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 1999 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | Impala |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2720 mm |