1952 BMW 340 vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (201 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 256 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2961 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |