1952 BMW 340 vs. 2000 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra CL (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 50 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 2000 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | BMW | Mahindra |
| Model | 340 | CL |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2040 mm |
