1952 BMW 340 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 510 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | 340 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1810 mm |
