1952 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 350 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 340 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |
