1952 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Megane weights approximately 140 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 340 | Megane |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2530 mm |