1952 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 340 weights approximately 416 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | BMW | Subaru |
Model | 340 | R2 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2370 mm |