1952 BMW 340 vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 850 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4161 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3280 mm |