1952 BMW 340 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 315 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |