1952 BMW 340 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 287 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2005 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | Impala |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |