1952 BMW 340 vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | 340 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
