1952 BMW 340 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 610 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | BMW | SsangYong |
Model | 340 | Rexton |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |