1952 BMW 340 vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 331 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2930 mm |